tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5553223153127316311.post7762788888768330554..comments2023-11-02T20:57:52.529+05:30Comments on Rajan's Take: Climate Change: Now a Climate Scientist Register - You Too Can register if QualifiedUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5553223153127316311.post-58472329477260430152010-09-16T17:54:40.346+05:302010-09-16T17:54:40.346+05:30I found your blog interesting.
Our Organization, ...I found your blog interesting.<br /><br />Our Organization, Liberty Institute, plans to send copies of the report of the NOn-Governmental International Panel of <br /><br />Climate Change (NIPCC) to scientists and activists interested in related issues.<br /><br />In case you are interested in having a copy, you can contact us at shanu@libertyinstitute.org.inAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5553223153127316311.post-76164098263042538252010-09-15T15:03:12.128+05:302010-09-15T15:03:12.128+05:30Yes Klaus. As usual on the mark and very lucid. Yo...Yes Klaus. As usual on the mark and very lucid. Your position is what science really should be all about. <br /><br />But the divide came because of the imposition "consensus science" on everyone and all who didn't accept the latter had to brand themselves or get branded as a denier.Rajan Alexanderhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07496301416048254072noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5553223153127316311.post-34732474640671342722010-09-15T14:46:56.338+05:302010-09-15T14:46:56.338+05:30Rajan and Tom, I suggest be careful with the phras...Rajan and Tom, I suggest be careful with the phrase "are highly sceptical". In fact there are scientists and other experts who are sceptical, but there are others who present a clear and undeniable disproof that any CO2 "greenhouse warming" was not possible at all. In particular those physicists and theoretical meteorologists whom I would call "the German school of thoughts" including Gerlich, Tscheuschner, Kramm (emigrated to Alaska, unfortunately), Dlugi, Zelger, Thieme, Hebert, Thüne have shown that the allure of a "greenhouse warming" does not fit physical principles. This is something fundamentally different from "being sceptic".<br /><br />So we should adjust our terminology. Everybody who disproves wrong claims by applying sciencitif methodology, care, and scrutiny is legitimally to be called a "scientist". And anybody who goes on using clearly falsified claims to support ideological concepts has to be called a "charlatan". <br /><br />Klaus Ermecke<br />KE Research<br />Oberhaching, Germany<br />www.ke-research.deAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com