It’s now official - Russia, Japan and Canada told the G8 they
would not join a second round of carbon cuts under the Kyoto Protocol at United
Nations talks this year. US President Barack Obama, at last Thursday
night's G8 dinner, also confirmed Washington would not join an updated Kyoto.
Meanwhile, the European Union is unlikely to
propose a deepening of the bloc’s greenhouse-gas reduction target before the
next global climate summit, due to start in November, Polish Environment
MinisterAndrzej Kraszewski was quoted by the media as saying. The Greenpeace
reaction then turned to anger and frustration by accusing world leaders of "gambling
with our future".
The Minerals Council of Australia, that included the coal industry celebrated.
They said sarcastically that Australia and the European Union were now the only
major developed nations or groups of nations committed to an extension of the
protocol after its expiry at the end of next year. "Confirmation of the likely demise of the
Kyoto Protocol means that Australia will be introducing a new $11 billion
carbon tax on the economy in the absence of a binding global agreement to
reduce emissions," the Minerals Council said. That carbon tax
proposal is on its way to toast in Australia that would be huge PR disaster for
the country's Prime Minister Ms Gilard, who staked her political fortune with
this bill.
As Ministers of the Brazil, South Africa, India, China (Basic) grouping met to
firm their position before further global climate change negotiating sessions,
they reiterated that a second commitment period to the Kyoto Protocol was
central to a comprehensive outcome at the 17th conference of the parties
(COP17) in Durban in November. Put simply, no Kyoto Protocol, no Global Climate
Treaty! In short - COP 17 is doomed to failure even before it even began.
These developments all came at a time when chief economist of the International
Energy Agency, Fatih Birol warned that the latest figures on greenhouse gas
emissions are "the
worst news" with statistics showing another record leap in carbon
output – 30.6 gigatonnes of CO2 over 2010 – to make the highest annual total in
history! If Faith Birol thought such alarmism will force a re-think among
policy makers he was grossly mistaken. Climate alarmism lost its sting after
Climategate exposed how that bullying, data manipulation and discrediting of
dissenters scandalised East Anglia's climate research unit (CRU) - the agency
that put together the historical temperature data on which the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change based its warming scenarios. Dr
Kevin Trenberth of the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) in one
email of the Climategate fame observed:
"The fact is that we can’t account for the lack of warming at the
moment and it is a travesty that we can’t."
No comments:
Post a Comment