The UK Government recent admission that there had been no detectable global warming signal for last 16 years has driven the last nail into the global warming scam.· The figures reveal that from the beginning of 1997 until August 2012 there was no discernible rise in aggregate global temperatures· This means that the ‘pause’ in global warming has now lasted for about the same time as the previous period when temperatures rose, 1980 to 1996Remember, it is on the model projections of UK’s Met Office’s Hadley Center: “Catastrophic” 5-7°C warming by 2100 on current emissions path that the world had been exhorted to cut their co called “carbon footprint” by a so called binding global treaty.So what are the implications of the latest admission by the UK government? Here are some extracts from the Daily Mail article:“Here are three not-so trivial questions you probably won’t find in your next pub quiz. First, how much warmer has the world become since a) 1880 and b) the beginning of 1997? And what has this got to do with your ever-increasing energy bill?You may find the answers to the first two surprising. Since 1880, when reliable temperature records began to be kept across most of the globe, the world has warmed by about 0.75 degrees Celsius.From the start of 1997 until August 2012, however, figures released last week show the answer is zero: the trend, derived from the aggregate data collected from more than 3,000 worldwide measuring points, has been flat.”
Read the full UK Daily Mail’s article: hereWhy Global Warming Hypothesis now stands officially falsified
Jochem Marotzke, Director of the warmist Max Planck Institute for Meteorology in Hamburg admitted the lack of warming in an interview and confessed being unable to explain it:
"In the models they occur about every 80 years. However, none of them up to now have shown a pause of 15 years. Also the models that run on the super-computers of the Hamburg Climate Research Centre also show such plateau phases. The physical causes are still unclear, and ours show them occurring at other times. Thus the models are not consistent with the current observations".According to the NOAA State of the Climate 2008 report, if climate computer model do not show that the planet has warmed for periods of 15 years or more, the climate models predicting man-made warming from CO2 will be falsified at a confidence level of 95%.The Climategate emails in addition have several references of IPCC scientists admitting the cooling trend. In one of the hacked Climategate emails, Phil Jones, the Director of UK’s CRU, East Anglia University was found observing:“...the no upward trend has to continue for a total of 15 years before we get worried";Since 1997, there has been an absence of statistically significant warming and 2012 would mark 16 years of a no warming trend. Such a conclusion is apparent which ever global temperature dataset is referred to and cuts across the surface vs satellite temperature dataset divide. Climate models are accordingly falsified at the 95% confidence level in a matter of months and would trigger the signal to revert back to the null hypothesis that man-made CO2 is not causing global warming.
Climate Alarmists: Guilty of Crime Against Humanity
"I perceive Greenpeace to be an organisation which was once well-intentioned but which has degenerated to become an extremist, semi-religious group where advancing of its beliefs justifies the use of even unethical means.
The fundamental error – as I see it – is that it sees “humans” as somehow being separate from “environment” and the development of humanity as a threat to environment. Greenpeace and other similar organisations have lost sight of the fact that humans and their works are part of the “environment” and that the environment needs to be subservient to the needs of human development. They have become part of the coercive and alarmist movement that is eco-fascism.”
This was Patrick Moore, a Co-Founder of Greenpeace on why left the organization. This description of Greenpeace may also find an apt fit with other International NGOs like WWF; Oxfam; ActionAid; ChristianAid; Sierra Club etc and local NGOs such as Gene Campaign; Devender Sharma; Centre for Sustainable Agriculture etc who all are complicit in the climate scam They are guilty of creating false hysteria that climate-change impacts are potentially catastrophic for many of the poorest people around the world as it causes floods, droughts, disease, reduced bio-diversity and agriculture failings which in turn accentuates poverty and hunger.However in the real world, where a CO2-climate link is still speculative, at best, and where real horrors already killing millions of real people it is incidences like lung infections, 1.4 million … intestinal diseases, 700,000 … malaria a million more mothers, fathers and children – year after year.They are dying because they don’t have access to the hydrocarbon energy these NGOs want to consign to the ash heap of history. That hydrocarbon energy could purify water; replace open fires to heat homes and cook food; fuel cars, trucks and buses that carry people, food and consumer products; and generate electricity to power homes, hospitals, schools, factories, offices and shops – to create jobs, hope, opportunity, prosperity, and infinitely better health than people in those impoverished nations have ever known.Instead of tacking real problems, these NGOs advocate policies to tackle an imaginary crisis. So funds that could have been otherwise used for development are diverted to fight an imaginary crisis. Taxes have been imposed worldwide that accentuates unemployment; poverty and hunger. What’s worse are the solutions they espouse and implement. Ex-Greenpeace heavy weight, Bjorn Lomborg founder of Copenhagen Consensus Center elucidates the madness of such policies:
“sensible solutions through an alarmist panic, leading to bad policies.Consider one of the most significant steps taken to respond to climate change. Adopted because of the climate panic, bio-fuels were supposed to reduce CO2 emissions. Hansen described them as part of a “brighter future for the planet.” But using bio-fuels to combat climate change must rate as one of the poorest global “solutions” to any great challenge in recent times.Bio-fuels essentially take food from mouths and put it into cars. The grain required to fill the tank of an SUV with ethanol is enough to feed one African for a year. Thirty percent of this year’s corn production in the United States will be burned up on America’s highways. This has been possible only through subsidies that globally will total $15 billion this year alone.Because increased demand for bio-fuels leads to cutting down carbon-rich forests, a 2008 Science study showed that the net effect of using them is not to cut CO2 emissions, but to double them. The rush towards bio-fuels has also strongly contributed to rising food prices, which have tipped another roughly 30 million people into starvation.Because of climate panic, our attempts to mitigate climate change have provoked an unmitigated disaster. We will waste hundreds of billions of dollars, worsen global warming, and dramatically increase starvation.”Equally devastating had been the promotion of renewable energy which besides being prohibitively expensive does not produce any significant power, threatening to cripple the economies even advanced nations like Germany and the UK. By making fossil fuels scarcer and more expensive, while spending billions of taxpayer dollars to subsidize wind, solar and biofuel energy, their war on fossil fuels is designed to force global citizens to abandon the energy sources that power our economy. The goal is to force us to turn to inefficient, unreliable, impractical, expensive, job-killing energy sources that emit less CO2.Even worse was the attempt to reduce food production by the promotion of so called “Climate Smart Agriculture”
Gaia Theorist and climate visionary James Lovelock has recently become the latest high-profile alarmist to admit the movement never actually knew what it was talking about. Lovelock recanted his climate alarmist sins admitting, ‘The problem is we don’t know what the climate is doing’. True enough. But previously Lovelock was one of many quite prepared to ‘put democracy on hold’ for the cause (a code for ‘stopping you and me from having a say’ and them getting their way)George Orwell once said:“In a time of universal deceit - telling the truth is a revolutionary act.”And yet, writing for Forbes Magazine, climate change alarmist Steve Zwick calls for skeptics of man-made global warming to be tracked hunted down and have their homes burned to the ground, yet another shocking illustration of how eco-fascism is rife within the environmentalist lobby. And he is not the only one. Many had advocated that we climate sceptics be put on trial for Crimes Against Humanity. This is as William Shenstone once described as:“A liar begins with making falsehood appear like truth, and ends with making truth itself appear like falsehood.”“In the end, what is true will come to be known” goes an old saying. And that’s what happened to climate alarmism with now they admitting their predictions of accelerated warming has come to naught. If any is guilty of Crimes Against Humanity, then it are the climate alarmists, not us, climate sceptics.So what exactly is Crimes Against Humanity?The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court defines “crimes against humanity” as acts that are:“committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack directed against any civilian population, with knowledge of the attack – intentionally causing great suffering, or serious injury to body or to mental or physical health.”So think about this irony. It is common for NGOs to demand many political leaders to be tried for Crimes Against Humanity. Now the likes of Rajendra Pachauri (IPCC), Kumi Naidoo and Samit Aich, (Greenpeace), James P Leape and Nitin Desai (WWF); Barbara Stocking and Nisha Aggrawal (Oxfam) Joanna Kerr andSandeep Chachra (ActionAid); Loretta Minghella and Anand Kumar (ChristianAid) etc could be hauled up and tried for Crimes Against Humanity!