New research by Professor
Jim Smith, of the University of Portsmouth, and colleagues from the University
of the West of England has cast doubt on earlier studies on the impact on birds
of the catastrophic nuclear accident at Chernobyl in April 1986.
Their findings, published
in the Royal Society journal Biology Letters, are likely to also apply to
wildlife at Fukushima in Japan following its nuclear disaster in 2011 and
represent an important step forward in clarifying the debate on the biological
effects of radiation.
Professor Smith, an
environmental physicist at the School of Earth and Environmental Sciences,
said:
“I
wasn’t really surprised by these findings – there have been many high profile
findings on the radiation damage to wildlife at Chernobyl but it’s very
difficult to see significant damage and we are not convinced by some of the
claims.
“We
can’t rule out some effect on wildlife of the radiation, but wildlife
populations in the exclusion zone around Chernobyl have recovered and are
actually doing well and even better than before because the human population
has been removed.”
Until now, scientists had
thought radiation had a dramatic effect on bird populations following the
Chernobyl disaster because it had caused damage to birds’ antioxidant defence
mechanisms. But Professor Smith and colleagues have, for the first time,
quantified this effect. Their study modelled the production of free radicals
from radiation, concluding that the birds’ antioxidant mechanisms could easily
cope with radiation at density levels similar to those seen at Chernobyl and
Fukushima.
Professor Smith said:
“We
showed that changes in anti-oxidant levels in birds in Chernobyl could not be
explained by direct radiation damage. We would expect other wildlife to be
similarly resistant to oxidative stress from radiation at these levels.
“Similarly,
radiation levels at Fukushima would not be expected to cause oxidative stress
to wildlife. We believe that it is likely that apparent damage to bird
populations at Chernobyl is caused by differences in habitat, diet or ecosystem
structure rather than radiation.
“It is
well-known that immediately after the Chernobyl accident; extremely high
radiation levels did damage organisms. But now, radiation levels at Chernobyl
are hundreds of times lower and, while some studies have apparently seen
long-term effects on animals, others have found no effect.
Some
Belarussian and Ukrainian scientists who live and work in the Chernobyl
exclusion zone have reported big increases in wildlife populations since the
accident, due to the removal of humans from the area."
Professor Smith has studied
contamination at Chernobyl for more than 20 years and regularly visited the
exclusion zone for his research. He is author of a major book about the
incident, Chernobyl: Catastrophe and Consequences, and is a former member of
the International Atomic Energy Agency Chernobyl forum.
It is a good effort and real study of wildlife and how it was not affected due to radiation effect. In the absence of human population there is a change in the living style of birds and animals. I sincerely appreciate to bring it to the larger audience by Mr. Rajan Alexander of DCG.
ReplyDelete